![]() It is not that difficult to work with FortiGate.ĥ. So if you know what you are doing you can get by with FortiGate just fine and save a bunch of money in the process. The down side of FortiGate is that their support isn't as great as Cisco. The only upside of buying Cisco these days is for the TAC support which of course comes with a huge cost of smartnet support cost.Ĥ. I am unsure if they will continue to sell the ASA with Firepower bundle.ģ. Cisco ASA will be end of production pretty soon. You can get a higher model of FortiGate with all the bells and whistles for a quarter of the price of the basic model of the Cisco Firepower (cisco's next gen firewalls).Ģ. The biggest difference between the two is the pricing. They are improving on that regard, but still lag behind other vendors with UTM devices.ġ. If you are looking for stability, reliability and great support, and you don't mind spending some extra dollars then this is the way to go, Firepower adds some of the missing features that other vendors offer, but not as well integrated IMO. They are more expensive and offer less features, but they do the work they are built for, and they do it exceptionally. Not as friendly as Fortinet, takes effort deploy and maintain. Stability and reliability is OK (careful with software upgrades as they tend to break some things).Ĭisco ASA: My personal preference because of the peace of mind they provide (specially if it's your phone that rings every time something breaks). However, beware of Fortinet's promises performance-wise, if you take this route you'll want to over-dimension your device a bit, otherwise you will not be activating the features you're buying. If you're looking for a lot of features at a relatively low price point this is the way to go. Fortinet FGs: Great devices, relatively easy to deploy and maintain.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |